nikon/docsearch

Fork 0

vvo 0beed5e431 chore(release): git add CONTRIBUTING too

2015-12-16 11:53:29 +01:00

7.2 KiB

Raw Blame History

Hi (future) collaborator!

tl;dr;

submit pull requests to develop branch
use conventional changelog commit style messages
squash your commits
have fun

Table of Contents

Where to start?
Development workflow
- Local example
- Documentation website
Adding/Updating a package
Removing a package
In case of shrinkwrap madness
Commit message guidelines
- Revert
- Type
- Scope
- Subject
- Body
- Footer
Stash your commits
When are issues closed?
Releasing
- Beta releases
Hotfixes
- Releasing hotfixes
- Documentation updates

Where to start?

Have a fix or a new feature? Search for corresponding issues first then create a new one.

Always check the status of the develop branch for the freshest code.

Always submit pull requests to the develop branch.

Development workflow

Local example

We use a simple documentation example website as a way to develop the docsearch.js library.

Requirements:

Node.js
npm@2

npm run dev
# open http://localhost:8080

Documentation website

This is the Jekyll instance running at https://community.algolia.com/docsearch.

Requirements:

Ruby
Bundler

npm run dev:docs
# open http://localhost:4000/docsearch/

Adding/Updating a package

We use a specific shrinkwrapping tool and npm@2.

npm install
npm install package --save[-dev]
npm run shrinkwrap

Removing a package

npm install
npm remove package --save[-dev]
npm run shrinkwrap

Removing packages can be really tricky to handle if the package was used by both the host project and sub dependencies.

In case of shrinkwrap madness

rm -rf node_modules
rm npm-shrinkwrap.json
npm cache clean
npm install
# check everything is working
npm run shrinkwrap

Don't do this too often because it breaks the whole shrinkwrap idea. Since you are completely rebuilding the dependency tree and possibly updating things.

Commit message guidelines

We use conventional changelog to generate our changelog from our git commit messages.

Here are the rules to write commit messages, they are the same than angular/angular.js.

Each commit message consists of a header, a body and a footer. The header has a special format that includes a type, a scope and a subject:

<type>(<scope>): <subject>
<BLANK LINE>
<body>
<BLANK LINE>
<footer>

The header is mandatory and the scope of the header is optional.

Any line of the commit message cannot be longer 100 characters! This allows the message to be easier to read on GitHub as well as in various git tools.

Revert

If the commit reverts a previous commit, it should begin with revert: , followed by the header of the reverted commit. In the body it should say: This reverts commit <hash>., where the hash is the SHA of the commit being reverted.

Type

Must be one of the following:

feat: A new feature
fix: A bug fix
docs: Documentation only changes
style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc)
refactor: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
perf: A code change that improves performance
test: Adding missing tests
chore: Changes to the build process or auxiliary tools and libraries such as documentation generation

Scope

The scope could be anything specifying place of the commit change. For example RefinementList, refinementList, rangeSlider, CI, url, build etc...

Subject

The subject contains succinct description of the change:

use the imperative, present tense: "change" not "changed" nor "changes"
don't capitalize first letter
no dot (.) at the end

Body

Just as in the subject, use the imperative, present tense: "change" not "changed" nor "changes". The body should include the motivation for the change and contrast this with previous behavior.

Footer

The footer should contain any information about Breaking Changes and is also the place to reference GitHub issues that this commit Closes.

Breaking Changes should start with the word BREAKING CHANGE: with a space or two newlines. The rest of the commit message is then used for this.

Stash your commits

Once you are done with a fix or feature and the review was done, squash your commits to avoid things like "fix dangling comma in bro.js", "fix after review"

Example: - feat(widget): new feature blabla.. - refactor new feature blablabla... - fix after review ...

*both commits should be squashed in a single commit: feat(widget) ..

When are issues closed?

Once the a fix is done, having the fix in the develop branch is not sufficient, it needs to be part of a release for us to close the issue.

So that you never ask yourself "Is this released?".

Instead of closing the issue, we will add a ✔ to be released label.

Releasing

If you are a maintainer, you can release.

We use semver.

You must be on the master branch.

npm run release

This task will merge develop into master.

Beta releases

You must be on the develop branch.

npm run release:beta

This task will release a beta version of what is currently in develop branch.

It will not update the latest tag of the npm release nor update jsDelivr /1/.

Hotfixes

All our work is done on the develop branch but it could be necessary to push a hotfix to the master branch and do a patch release. To fix a very important bug.

For this, you should:

add hotfix to the commit message body
submit your pull request to the master branch

Releasing hotfixes